ஆசிரியர் தகுதித்தேர்வு தாள் 2 காலதாமதமாக தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி நீதியரசர் நாகமுத்து அவர்கள் தீர்ப்பு முழுவிவரம்

ஆசிரியர் தகுதித்தேர்வு தாள் 2 காலதாமதமாக தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி நீதியரசர் நாகமுத்து அவர்கள் தீர்ப்பு 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS 

DATED: 20.03.2014 

CORAM 

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU 

W.P.No.2411 of 2014 

and M.P.No.1 of 2014 

D.Priya

... Petitioner 

-Versus- 

The Chairman, 

Teachers Recruitment Board, 

EVK Sampath Maaligai,

College Road, Chennai 60006. 

... Respondent 

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.11.2013 and declare the correct answers in respect of Paper II 'A' Series key answers for questions Nos.8, 11, 24, 29 and Question No.61 Part III, 84 in the Teachers Eligibility Test conducted on 18.08.2013 and award three marks to the petitioner in respect of the said questions and appoint the petitioner as B.T. Assistant pursuant to the said examination. 

For Petitioner : Mrs.A.L.Ganthimathi 

For Respondent : Mr.D.Krishnakumar, 

Spl. Govt. Pleader 

ORDER 

The petitioner participated in the Tamil Nadu Teacher Eligibility Test (TNTET-II) held on 18.08.2013. The tentative key answers were published calling for objection, if any. Based on the objections and based on the opinion of the experts, final key answers were published and the results were also published after a due valuation. Several writ petitions were filed challenging the key answers to a number of questions. All such writ petitions were considered, while I was sitting in Madurai Bench, and final orders were passed. The relief was given to all the candidates irrespective of fact whether the candidate had approached the court or not. After everything was over, a batch of writ petitions in W.P.(MD) No.19259 of 2013, etc., came to be filed with a grievance in respect of key answers. All such writ petitions were dismissed, by a common order dated 28.11.2013, on the ground of laches and the Writ Appeals filed against that order were also dismissed. Admittedly, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition belatedly. Thus, the petitioner is guilty of laches. Hence, the writ petition deserves only to be dismissed.

2. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed. 

To 

1.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, EVK Sampath 

Maaligai, College Road, Chennai 60006. 

Writ Petition 

No.2411 of 2014