சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் முதுகலை தமிழாசிரியர் C வகை வினாத்தாளில் இறுதி
விடக்குறிப்பு தவறு என தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்ட மனு தள்ளுபடி.முதுகலை
தமிழாசிரியர் C வகை வினாத்தாளில் வினா எண்கள் 45, 70 and 104 க்கு டிஆர்பி யின் இறுதி விடக்குறிப்பு தவறு என கே ஆர்விஜயா
சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தாக்கல் செய்த மனுவை விசாரணைக்கு
எடுத்துக்கொண்ட நீதிபதி நாகமுத்து அவற்றுக்கு Trb வெளியிட்ட இறுதி
விடக்குறிப்பு (final key ) சரியே எனக் கூறி அவரின் மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்து
உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளார்.
தீர்ப்பின் சில முக்கிய பகுதிகள்:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directingthe respondents to revalue the Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 of Booklet Series "C" of the written Examination for direct recruitment of PG Assistant 2012-13 in Tamilthat the Madurai Bench of this Court had dismissed a number of writ petitions on the ground of latches, but, those were pertaining to the candidates who had written their examinations in the subjects other than Tamil where the final key answers were published as early as on 07.10.2013 itself. But, so far as the Tamil subject is concerned, for some reasons or other, the final key answers were not at all published on 07.10.2013 and, as a matter of fact, the same were published only on 23.12.2013. Immediately, thereafter, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition because, according to the petitioner, her objections regarding key answers for the above said three questions were not considered properly.
In view of all the above, I hold that there is no latches on the part of the petitioner and so, this writ petition cannot be dismissed on the ground of latches.the challenges made in respect of Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 to say whether the petitioner has demonstrated that the key answersare wrong. I hold that the petitionerhas failed to demonstrate that the key answers in respect of Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 in C series are wrong and so, this writ petition is liable only to be dismissd.
தீர்ப்பின் சில முக்கிய பகுதிகள்:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directingthe respondents to revalue the Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 of Booklet Series "C" of the written Examination for direct recruitment of PG Assistant 2012-13 in Tamilthat the Madurai Bench of this Court had dismissed a number of writ petitions on the ground of latches, but, those were pertaining to the candidates who had written their examinations in the subjects other than Tamil where the final key answers were published as early as on 07.10.2013 itself. But, so far as the Tamil subject is concerned, for some reasons or other, the final key answers were not at all published on 07.10.2013 and, as a matter of fact, the same were published only on 23.12.2013. Immediately, thereafter, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition because, according to the petitioner, her objections regarding key answers for the above said three questions were not considered properly.
In view of all the above, I hold that there is no latches on the part of the petitioner and so, this writ petition cannot be dismissed on the ground of latches.the challenges made in respect of Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 to say whether the petitioner has demonstrated that the key answersare wrong. I hold that the petitionerhas failed to demonstrate that the key answers in respect of Question Nos.45, 70 and 104 in C series are wrong and so, this writ petition is liable only to be dismissd.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Dear Reader,
Enter Your Comments Here...